Criteria for qualifying or rejecting publications

Each article is directed to the evaluation by at least two Reviewers who are experts in the field. The reviewers signs a declaration that there is no conflict of interest between them and the author of the article.
Each article is evaluated in terms of:

• compliance of the title of the article with its content,
• compliance of the article summary with its content,
• a new approach to the presented problem,
• correctness of the substantive part of the article,
• compliance of conclusions with results of tests, simulations or calculations presented in the article,
• correctness of the selection and use of literature.

The reviewers can indicate whether the article fully or partially meets the criteria presented above, or fail to meet them or indicate a variant according to the comments.
Next, the Reviewers may provide confidential comments to the Editorial Board and detailed information/comments for Authors. In the system, it is possible to attach a PDF file with the detailed comments of the Reviewers. The Editorial Board are obliged to pass the reviewers' comments via e-mail to the Authors.

The review contains a clear conclusion of the Reviewer regarding the conditions of acceptance of an article for publication or its rejection:

• the article can be published without making changes,
• the article can be published after making changes indicated in the review,
• the article can be published after making the changes indicated in the review and obtaining the reviewer's approval,
• the article is not eligible for printing.